A consistent structure is frequently necessary for reflective writing or academic footprints that is to be used as a paper submission in a reputable international journal. Contrary to popular opinion, footprints are more than just a daily journal of your thoughts and emotions. For academic reflective writing, both the language and the structure are crucial. One wants to closely mimic the format of an academic essay. A good essay should include an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. One will need to describe the background, analyze it, and draw conclusions when engaging in academic reflection. The amount of time that should be spent discussing the context and how much time should be devoted to analyzing and drawing conclusions are not, however, governed by a single set of guidelines. In light of the fact that learning typically occurs when analyzing and synthesizing rather than describing, it is wise to only describe in detail enough for the reader to grasp your context.
The value of journals in academic life extends beyond their function as a channel of communication and a repository of records. The majority of research results are published as journal articles, and a researcher’s performance and productivity are typically assessed based on both the quantity and quality of publications. Journals now form a significant part of academic infrastructure. Career paths, including financing and appointments, depend on them. According to author polls, “advancing my career” and “future funding” are significant drivers for authors to publish their work. Journals frequently cover a narrow range of topics and specialize. Their reputation is used as a stand-in for the research conducted there and its importance as they compete for publications.
Authors and academia regularly use (and abuse) the impact factor (a measure of the citations to a certain journal) to pick where to publish as well as how to rate the importance of a publication. The impact factor of a journal is a strict and frequently deceptive soundbite, similar to the phrase “megapixel” for digital cameras; the significance of a journal articles to a specific community is not necessarily represented in its impact factor. This will be covered in a subsequent post in the series. There are many different reasons why authors choose to publish, and there are a wide range of article types.
Despite the common misconception that a journal only publishes research papers, there are many different types of articles that serve the communication and community-building functions. Researchers can benefit equally from news, editorials, letters, reviews, comments, photographs, audio snippets, and other types of “articles,” all of which can be found in journals. An academic journal is a periodical that features articles published by academics, researchers, and other subject matter specialists. Journal articles concentrate on a certain subject or area of research. Journals, as opposed to newspapers and magazines, are written for an academic or specialized audience, not for general readers. Publications can also be seen as a resource that helps writers establish themselves as authorities in an area on a national and international scale. An individual, department, university, and organizations can gain international recognition by publishing in peer-reviewed journals.
Academic journal publication reform
Scholarly paper:
A paper is an academic work that is often published in an academic journal in academic publishing. It contains original study findings or summaries of prior findings. Such a paper, also known as an article, will only be regarded as legitimate if it goes through a peer review procedure wherein one or more referees, who are academics in the same field, determine whether the paper’s content is appropriate for publication in the journal. Before an article is finally approved or rejected for publication, it could go through a number of reviews, modifications, and re-submissions. Normally, this procedure takes several months. Then, it frequently takes many months (or even over a year in some professions) before an approved submission is published. This is especially true for the most read publications, where there are frequently more accepted papers than there is room to print them. As a result, many academics publish a “preprint” or “postprint” version of their article on their own website or the website of their school for free download.
Some journals—especially the most recent ones—now solely publish in electronic form. Nowadays, both libraries and private subscribers can access paper journals in electronic form. Nearly always, these electronic versions are made available to subscribers as soon as the paper version is published, sometimes even before; occasionally, they are also made available to non-subscribers, either right away (by open access journals) or after an embargo of up to 24 months or more, in order to prevent subscription losses. Journals with this kind of delayed access are commonly referred to as delayed open access journals.
Peer Review
Peer review is a fundamental idea in most academic publishing; for a work to be published, other experts in the field must deem it to be of a caliber that justifies publication. As a result of reviewers’ familiarity with the author’s sources, the procedure also serves as a loose defense against plagiarism(s). Peer review of contributions as a standard procedure can be traced back to 1752, when the Royal Society of London assumed official control of Philosophical Transactions. But there were some earlier instances. Although most journal editors concur that the system is vital to quality control in terms of rejecting subpar work, there have been instances where significant results have been rejected by one journal before being submitted to others. Peer review’s failure to guarantee the identification of high-quality work may be its most well-known flaw. The unintentional propensity to accept reports that agree with the reviewer’s viewpoints and to minimize those that do not is known as “confirmatory bias.” Experimental research demonstrates the issue with peer review.
Publishing Procedure
Peer review and production are the two different stages of the academic publishing process, which starts when writers submit a paper to a publisher. The journal editor organizes the peer review process, which is finished when the article’s content, together with any related photos, data, and supplemental material, are approved for publication. Peer review is increasingly managed online, using open source and free software, proprietary systems, and paid software packages. The author(s) of the article revise their submission in response to the reviewers’ suggestions after each round of review, and the process is continued until the editor is pleased and the work is accepted. The article then goes through copy editing, typesetting, inclusion in a particular issue of a journal, printing, and online publication as part of the production process, which is overseen by a production editor or publisher. Academic copy editing entails substantive editing and discussions with the authors to verify that an article follows the journal’s house style, that all referencing and labeling is accurate, and that the language is clear and understandable. Because academic copy editing and authors’ editing tasks often overlap, editors employed by journal publishers frequently call themselves “manuscript editors.” Copyright is frequently transferred from the author to the publisher through this process. At one or more points during the production process, the author will evaluate and amend proofs. A proof reader must manually type the handwritten comments from authors and editors onto a clean version of the proof throughout the proof correction cycle, which has historically been labor-intensive. This technique was streamlined in the early 21st century by the addition of e-annotations in Microsoft Word, Adobe Acrobat, and other programs, but it was still a lengthy and error-prone process. With the advent of online collaborative writing platforms like Authorea, Google Docs, Overleaf, and various others, where a remote service monitors the copy-editing interactions of multiple authors and exposes them as explicit, actionable historic events, the full automation of the proof-correction cycles has only recently become feasible. A final version of record is released at the conclusion of this procedure. Journal publications have occasionally been retracted for a variety of causes, including scientific misconduct.
Citations
Academic writers reference their sources in their writing to back up their claims and arguments and to aid readers in learning more about the topic at hand. Additionally, it avoids plagiarism and gives acknowledgment to authors whose works are used. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the research literature have both addressed the issue of dual publication, also known as self-plagiarism. Each academic publication has a unique citation style (also known as references). The APA, CMS, and MLA formats are some of the most often used in research articles. In the social sciences, the American Psychological Association (APA) style is frequently employed. In the fields of business, communications, economics, and social sciences, the Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) is employed. To make it easier for readers to find the sources, the CMS style uses footnotes at the bottom of the page. In the humanities, the Modern Language Association (MLA) style is frequently employed.
Publishing By Subject
Biological sciences:
The production of English-language scholarly journals alone contributed $9.4 billion of the $23.5 billion in income earned in 2011 by the enormous industry of scientific, technical, and medical (STM) literature. The majority of scientific research is initially published in peer-reviewed journals, which are regarded as primary sources. The primary literature is completed by technical reports for ancillary study findings as well as engineering and design work (including computer software). In the sciences, secondary sources include books for huge projects, comprehensive arguments, or collections of articles, as well as papers in review journals (which provide a synthesis of research articles on a topic to emphasize advances and new avenues of research). Encyclopedias and other similar works written for a general audience as well as academic libraries might be considered tertiary sources. In several areas of applied science, especially in American computer science research, there is a partial exception to the rules regarding scientific publication. Some academic conferences are a notable venue for publication in American computer science. There are many such conferences, research advances quickly, and support from the computer science professional societies for the distribution and storage of conference papers are all factors contributing to this departure.
Sociological Sciences
In several domains, publishing in the social sciences looks significantly different. Similar to the scientific sciences, other fields, like economics, may have very “strict” or highly quantitative standards for publishing. Others, like anthropology or sociology, place more of an emphasis on quantitative work while also emphasizing fieldwork and reporting on first-hand observation. Some social scientific disciplines, like public health or demography, share important interests with industries like law and medicine, and researchers in these disciplines frequently publish in specialized journals.
Humanities:
In theory, publishing in the humanities is similar to publishing elsewhere in the academy; there are numerous periodicals accessible, ranging from general to highly specialized, and university presses regularly release new humanities volumes. The economics of the industry have seen a fundamental transformation with the advent of online publishing options, and the direction of the future is uncertain. Humanities papers frequently require years to write and additional years to publish, in contrast to science, where immediacy is crucial. In contrast to the sciences, research is typically a solitary endeavor and is rarely funded by sizable grants. Journals are primarily managed by academic departments and rarely turn a profit. The American scenario is described in the following. A published book or one that is soon to be published is now frequently required before tenure in numerous subjects, including literature and history, where several published pieces are typically necessary for a first tenure-track employment. Some critics believe that this de facto system was established without considering its ramifications, which has led to the publication of a great deal of subpar work and unfair expectations on the already constrained research time of young scientists. Making matters worse, many humanities professors’ first books only sell a few hundred copies, which frequently is not enough to cover the cost of printing them. Additionally, many libraries cancelled subscriptions to many humanities journals in the 1990s, which led to a decline in circulation of many of these journals to almost untenable levels. To relieve the financial strain on journals, some academics have proposed tying a publication subvention of a few thousand dollars to each graduate student grant or new tenure-track employment.
You can Submit Your Article (All fields of research) for Publication at https://iarrj.com/call-for-paper/
Open Access Journal
Anyone in the globe with an Internet connection can freely view and reuse the content under Open Access. Back to the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing, Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, and Budapest Open Access Initiative terms. Because of the following, to paraphrase the Library of Trinity College Dublin: “The impact of the work available as Open Access is maximized.”
• The audience for Open Access content is far larger than for journals whose full-text access is only available to subscribers.
• Specialized web harvesters can read the contents’ details.
• Content details are also accessible using standard search engines like Google, Google Scholar, Yahoo, etc.
Article Processing Charges (APC), which are paid by authors or their sponsors and are sometimes incorrectly referred to as a “open access model,” are one specific funding scheme that is sometimes confused with open access. This term is misleading because there are numerous other models, such as those listed in the Budapest Open Access Initiative Declaration’s original list of funding sources: “the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of the o See Flexible membership funding model for Open Access publishing with no author-facing charges for a more recent open public discussion of open access funding methods. Using the APC model, prestigious publications frequently charge several thousand dollars. With over 300 journals and costs ranging from £1000 to £2500, Oxford University Press offers authors from underdeveloped nations savings of 50% to 100%. There are 700 journals offered by Wiley Blackwell, and each journal has a distinct price. With more than 2600 journals, Springer charges US$3000 or EUR 2200. (excluding VAT). According to a survey, the typical APC (ensuring open access) ranged from $1,418 to $2,727 USD. After that, users and libraries can access scholarly journals and individual articles online for free.
The majority of open access journals eliminate all the financial, technical, and legal restrictions that only allow paying consumers to access scholarly materials. Examples of this type that are well-known include BioMed Central and the Public Library of Science. On the grounds of quality, fee-based open access publication has drawn criticism, as the drive to increase publishing revenues may lead certain journals to reduce the standard of peer review. However, the subscription model also exhibits a similar desire, with publishers increasing the number of articles published or subscriptions to support fee increases. It could be criticized financially as well because the required publication or subscription fees have turned out to be more expensive than anticipated. Open access proponents typically respond that since peer review plays a similar role in open access as it does in traditional publication, the quality should be the same (recognizing that both traditional and open access journals have a range of quality). It has also been stated that excellent research conducted by academic institutions unable to pay for open access may not be published at all, while the majority of open access journals allow authors from poor nations or those in financial need to waive the publication charge. Regardless of whether they publish in a journal or not, all authors have the option of self-archiving their papers in their institutional repositories or disciplinary repositories to make them open access. Authors or their supporters pay a subscription journal a publication fee to make each individual article open access if they publish in a hybrid open access journal.
The additional papers in these hybrid journals are either released later or are only accessible through subscription. Such a hybrid option has already been introduced by the majority of established publishers, notably Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press, and Springer Science+Business Media, and more are doing the same. However, the percentage of authors that employ an open access option in a hybrid open access journal may be low. It is also still unknown whether this is applicable in industries other than the sciences, where outside funding is far less common. A number of funding organizations, including the Wellcome Trust and various UK Research Council divisions, announced in 2006 that they would provide additional funding to their grantees for such open access journal publication fees. The European Union Council decided in May 2016 that starting in 2020, all scientific publications resulting from publicly funded research must be freely accessible. It must also have the best possible reusability of research data. Unless there are valid justifications to the contrary, such as intellectual property rights, security concerns, or privacy concerns, the data must be made accessible to do that.
Publishers’ Function In Scholarly Communication
With what many of the big academic publishers are seen as being a reluctance to change, OA activists are becoming increasingly frustrated. Publishers are frequently charged with siphoning off and profiting from publicly sponsored research, employing unpaid academic labor for peer review, and selling the papers that result back to academia at exorbitant prices. Hyperbole can sometimes result from such annoyances, with “publishers providing no value” being one of the most prevalent examples. Publishers do offer value to scholarly communication as it is now envisioned, but scholarly publishing in a reputable international journal is not an easy process. There are presently 102 items on Kent Anderson’s list of things that journal publishers perform, and no one who questions the worth of publishers has ever formally challenged it. Many things on the list, such as “Make money and stay a constant in the system of intellectual output,” might be argued to be valuable mainly to the publishers themselves. The academic literature is directed by others who offer direct value to researchers and research. Copy-editing, proofreading, typesetting, material styling, connecting the articles to open and accessible datasets, and—perhaps most crucially—managing scholarly peer review are all included in this. Other tasks include arbitrating conflicts (such as those involving ethics or authorship), stewarding the scholarly record, and managing peer review. The latter is a job that shouldn’t be undervalued because it essentially means pressuring people with busy schedules to volunteer their time to enhance someone else’s work and uphold the standard of the literature.
Not to mention the typical management procedures for big businesses, such as the ones for the infrastructure, the workforce, security, and marketing. Each of these elements helps to preserve the scholarly record in some way. However, it is debatable whether these tasks are actually necessary for scholarly communication’s primary objective, which is to disseminate research to other parties involved in the process, including researchers and decision-makers in the fields of economics, biomedicine, and industry, as well as the general public. For instance, in the case above, we consider whether the current infrastructure for peer review is necessary and consider whether a scholar-led crowdsourcing alternative could be preferable. The topic of whether for-profit businesses (or the private sector) should be permitted to administer and disseminate academic output and exercise their authority while primarily serving their own interests is also one of the greatest points of contention in this area. This is frequently taken into account in conjunction with the value added by such companies, and as a result, the two are closely related as part of larger questions on the proper use of public funds, the function of commercial entities in the public sector, and problems relating to the privatization of scholarly knowledge.
Certainly, publishing could be done for less money than is typical at the moment. The system has significant flaws that affect researchers, such as the frequent occurrence of repeated rejection and resubmission to different venues as well as the fact that some publishers make excessive profits. Transparency regarding the nature and caliber of the services that publishers provide is what is most lacking from the current publishing market. This would enable authors to choose based on information rather than on criteria irrelevant to the caliber of the research, like the JIF. The answers to all of the aforementioned queries are being looked into, and other options may be taken into account. Publishers still manage quality assurance, interlinking, and research findability processes in the existing system, nevertheless. Scholarly publishers are seen as needing to be able to defend their operation based on the intrinsic value that they add in order to combat the perception that they add no value to the process as their role within the knowledge communication industry continues to evolve.
Advantages Of Journal Publishing
Both the researcher and the organization hosting the journal stand to gain from having a research endeavor published in an approved publication. The research, together with its scientific and practical contributions, is communicated to others in a particular field through publication. The process of writing a manuscript, editing it, and submitting it for peer review can be challenging and time-consuming. By publishing a paper, a writer can take advantage of several advantages and job chances. As a writer, journal publication may be both a simple and advantageous procedure and a challenging one at the same time. Nobody will know what one has discovered if the work is not published. Today, publishing a writer’s study project is fairly usual. Additionally, many colleges and institutions require students to publish their study. Here are some advantages of writing and publishing articles.
• Making the right journal choice can assist researchers in contributing knowledge to the public discourse on contemporary issues that extend beyond the academic era.
• It is occasionally necessary to demand of funding organizations that they publish the work in a particular journal, make it open access, or adhere to other requirements of the grant award.
• The particular journal publication can assist one in connecting with the intended audience and completing the necessary steps to obtain the desired impact, engagement evidence, and connection with your study.
• The work’s rapid diffusion to a variety of readers, including people, libraries, organizations, and institutions
• Before being published, the work through a number of standard processes. When researchers prepare their research for publication, they get expertise about writing the ideal manuscript because the article that will be published involves numerous standards check and quality check, such as formatting, language, style, context, and content.
• Research can gain awareness and acknowledgment among other researchers by being published in journals.
• Numerous educational initiatives and online training are supported by the research publishing process. The researchers can learn and advance their skills through interactive training courses and seminars.
Future Development
By fulfilling the requirements set forth by the research industry, publishing in a particular journal can be crucial to advancing one’s career. When one want to publish the research paper, one can update it by focusing on previous research while focusing on new discoveries. Depending on the quantity of papers you have published, you may need to advertise and promote your research or yourself as a professor. One’s chances of having one research paper be sufficient to advance in an academic career also depend on where one publishes the papers, for example, if one chooses a journal with a high impact factor.
Conclusion
If one publishes the work in a reputable highly indexed international journal, doing so can hasten distribution, increase citations, and increase global database recognition for the research. Because interested readers are already reading it, journal publications lead to considerably faster discovery. The work in the discipline-specific research directories is preserved in part because to journal publication. A researcher who adds work to their record participates in the field’s research community, aiding in the growth of their professional networks, improving their opportunities for cooperation, and interacting with peer reviewers. Through the literature of the subject area, the study publishing through the accessible sources aids in the education of other students and advances knowledge in the field. Selecting the right journal can have a big impact on a researcher’s life as well as readers, citations, and impact on the journal publication.
Leave a Reply